They may very well be - as there ARE indeed Muslim fanatics who engage in terrorism (as there are Jewish, Buddhist, Christian & Hindu etc. fanatics who engage in terrorism as well)......how do we know that these terrorists are not mercenaries or special forces of a country (anyone can shout out 2 words in Arabic)? Or some country's Intelligence services? Do you think the CIA, MOSSAD, MI-5 or MI-6 or KGB etc. - have never used their own special forces in other (or even their own) countries to perform false-flag operations? Operations that are DESIGNED to have a political agenda end-result...such as making world opinion 'think' that someone/something you want to scape-goat is 'truly' responsible for YOUR underhand deeds.
If I was the one who 'set this up', my next move would be to select 3 Muslim males with criminal records (thousands to choose from in France), but narrow it down to at least 2 who have recently returned from the Middle East (say Syria or Libya for example) so I can say "they were trained to be military professionals over there by terrorists" - the public will buy this excuse readily. Then of course I would claim to have 'recovered' (after planting them in the accused homes or vehicles etc.) the SAME vest and masks and guns etc. 'as seen on TV'...because the public is SO gullible they will cite those 'discoveries' as 'irrefutable PROOF' that these 3 accused are indeed 'the right men'. It is so EASY to con the public - even Hitler famously said 'the public will believe a big lie faster than a small one - if you repeat it often enough'.
Another point I take note of here is the 'gun issue', firearms are strictly controlled in France, but you see for yourself that making it illegal for civilians to own guns does NOT stop criminals from getting any type of gun they desire, all civilian gun control does is make sure that civilians LIKE 10 OF THESE VICTIMS are completely defenseless when gun toting criminals attack them....how many of these victims MIGHT be alive now if they had hand guns on them when attacked?
I don't know about you...but i'd rather have a CHANCE to defend myself, than no chance at all.
FOOTAGE SHOWING ONE SHOT AT POLICEMAN MISSES HIM AND HITS THE PAVEMENT INSTEAD
Is it just me or do you also see what looks a lot like ONE bullet hitting the pavement near the officer and not actually hitting the officer? And THIS is what the media edited out and 'won't show because it is too upsetting"? Tell me another lie please!
NOW THE ONE FRENCHMAN WHO KNEW ALL THE FACTS 'KILLS HIMSELF' BEFORE HE COULD TELL ANYONE ELSE...HOW CONVENIENT
When I first mentioned this 'mystery' no mass media was yet reporting on it, now they are....isn't it bizarre that the one man with all he facts suddenly 'kills himself' before he could reveal what he found out? Add this to the 'footage too gruesome to show on TV' which actually showed the bullet MISSING the Policeman on the ground - and was not 'gruesome' by any stretch of the imagination....the declared 'facts' of this case do not add up at all...people died...but on who's orders and why? Nothing is ever exactly as it seems to be.