Monday, 31 March 2014


It might be an interesting project for me to list every war men in my family have fought in.....I mean, especially for my sons ...for me personally, I never felt that I was meant to 'merely live in a world at peace where the only 'important' thing was earning money' feels like a pretty worthless life to me....the way the world is heading...all those dreams of being in a future of conflicts that have plagued my mind since I was a lad of 10 - might yet come to pass, so be it, 30 years of premonitions have prepared me to face it with the same fortitude as my ancestors did 1000 years before me.

I can empathise with nobler causes, such as putting your life on the line for others and for causes much greater than your own my ancestors and family members who have participated (documented) in such wars over the last 1,000 years. As I tell my children always...'war' is not what makes one a 'great warrior' is how you conduct yourself in such evil times that determines whether you are 'great' or not.....not how many battles you have participated in - but how many of those battles revealed your bravery, your love for others you were trying to protect and willing to die doing so,...not how many victories you won - but how many lives of your defeated enemies did you spare when you had vanquished them and not murdered in vengeful cruelty....not how many enemies you have killed - but how many elders, women and children's lives you have SAVED.          

Just off the top of my head I can recount ancestor and family member participation in:

The Battle of Hastings 1066 (where my fathers ancestor is recorded as having 'slew many Englishmen with his sword on that day') and the Norman Invasion of England, the Crusades in the 1100-1200's (one ancestor died in Palestine as a Crusader, others survived), the Scottish Wars of Independence in the 1300's against England under Wallace, the War of the Roses in England in the 1400's,  the Anglo-Spanish war from the 1500's-1600's,  the English Civil War and the Anglo-Dutch Wars of the 1600's, the Anglo-Spanish war and American war of Independence (on the side of the British) of the 1700's, the Napoleonic wars of the 1800's, World War I, World War II, The Cuban Revolution, and the War in Angola - all of the 1900's.  

The photo below is of the medals cousin Aurelio (aka 'Yiyo') received for his role as a Guerrilla soldier in the Rebel Army of Fidel Castro in the 1959 Cuban Revolution. We tend to excel in the otherwise very stressful (for most others) situation of warfare, as though the ability to cope with the pressures of the madness 'come naturally to the men in our bloodline who more often than not - volunteer to serve.


I appreciate romance yes indeed, but I think common sense should take precedence over 'beautiful words & romantic sentiments' at times....I have been happily married for over 21 years (since I was 19 & my wife was 17), kind of a record for most young people in the world today....but I ALWAYS maintained that a spouse could/should never be THE most important person in anyone's we have OURlives to thank our spouses for? No....of course we do have to thank them for OUR children's lives (we made their physical bodies together)....but even our children - our flesh & blood - come higher in spiritual importance than our spouses.

Let us face COLD HARD FACTS....Our parents, siblings & children - will ALWAYS be our parents, siblings & children (we CANNOT change those FACTS)...but our spouse may not always be our spouse (as any divorced person knows very well...the person you sided with yesterday against your own family - might become the 'hated Ex' of your own tomorrow) and can be replaced at any time we so what is the bloody point turning your back on your parents (who YOU owe your life to) or your siblings or your children - who are your own flesh & blood....for it is these SAME people that you will inevitably run back to for comfort and support if your 'perfect marriage' should one day fail.

I am not saying to treat your spouse as a worthless 3rd wheel, but I AM saying do not put emotional ties OVER blood ties....or you might be left a lonely fool in the long run. Recognise what is 'inescapably permanent' - and what is 'potentially temporary'.
My wife and I always maintain that we will never put our love for each other (solid as it still is) OVER the love we have for our parents, siblings or some people who foolishly turn AGAINST their own flesh & blood for amorous love/lust/infatuation (which is replaceable) and fail to recognise the more spiritually significant and higher non-sexual love that exists in the minds of normal and spiritually far-thinking people who grew up in close-knit loving families.
When you are cognizant of the bigger picture (it is NOT just about you and your spouse and the rest of the world can kiss your ass) you will do your utmost to work through every problem because you realise how many OTHER lives are involved in 'your marriage'...but if you are blinded by the selfishly insular 'romantic love' - you are more likely to experience a failed marriage, because the same way it was 'always just about the two of you forsaking all others' (including your own family) will likewise make a similarly selfish decision to end your once 'perfect' marriage when the first serious problem comes along between the two of you.

I think 21 years of success in marriage warrants our philosophy being given more credit than the average person may assume on face has kept our marriage focussed on the bigger more important picture (i.e - we are NOT alone in this union and our responsibilities reach out far beyond the two of us) in our earthly lives, and does not limit us within the realm of emotional naivete that most married couples seem to exist within.


A very comprehensive and detailed treasure trove of information, not a glancing read by any stretch of the imagination, but definitely worth the time required to digest it ALL!

From my brother Ardaga Widor in Brazil


Take a read of what my Brazilian brother in the struggle to share knowledge with a world that increasingly prefers the bliss of ignorance..... 

Dear Sisters and Brothers spread all over Gaia:

As the world (shadow) leaders of stupidity and ruthless greed continue 
to push Mother Gaia into Her most serious man-caused transformation that 
might cause the end of the world as we know it 
there sure are voices that inform (what corporate media hides):

(To me) It is not a question of who to vote anymore. Since electoral 
democracy doesn't give any answers pro-life instead of pro-profit (for a 
few) anymore - ANYWHERE. And with every day that passes by and the world 
being steered into an abysm of no-return I see it as our (= the Peoples 
of One World) moral and survival duty to take things into our own hands. 
Now! And with no SUCH above-mentioned (shadow) leaders necessary. Yes we 
can! See the Zapatistas.

Yet I also ask myself more and more whether there actually still are 
many people out there who give a damn. As long as they manage to clinch 
on to a few leftover “privileges” (compared to the neoliberal 
waste-people and lumpen-proletariat concentrated outside the “G8” or 

To the comprehensive article I wrote and sent to you on the deadly 
impact of agribusiness-monocultures and the genocidal plight of 
Indigenous Peoples who defend Land as a common good and place of 
bio-diversity, diametrical to the neoliberal death imperative, and who 
are thus a living way/example OUT of the total destruction as coerced by 
the above-mentioned (shadow) leaders, has so far caused only four 
(northern indigenous) reactions. And none by those who I personally know 
and who personally know me and my struggle.
That makes me feel very sad. Asking myself a few questions I rather 
would not like to ask myself.

Ardaga Widor

Sunday, 30 March 2014


Most folks still honestly believe that we cannot find a passenger plane 777 jet...yet our satellites can & HAVE mapped the ENTIRE globe UNDER the oceans - and know exactly where every ridge, peak, crevasse etc. is MILES BELOW THE OCEAN'S SURFACE...and the 'war on terror' has revealed that every square foot of the Earth's land surface is under satellite digitally recording surveillance 24 hours a day - with technology that allows for human facial recognition/license plate legibility under magnification from long are we going to believe these 'we can't find the missing 777' lies?

Here is what Gordon Duff's private investigations have revealed:

Today we are told that the fate of Flight 370 is known, not yet identified debris has been spotted in what is called “the Southern Indian Ocean,” perhaps more appropriately described as “north of Antarctica.”
We also know that the 777/200 is a “fly by wire” aircraft with controls in place that allow the CIA to remotely pilot the plane “in case of emergency.”  We were able to verify the design and implementation of this system through Boeing, Raytheon and commercial pilots.
Flight 370 The CIA Hoax
The descriptions today in the New York Times and other publications are purposefully inaccurate and contradictory.  Their explanations of how commercial aircraft communicate and are tracked are fanciful at best, at worst “criminal.”
When Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 was reported as having crashed in the South China Sea, a massive cover up began yet no one will speak of it, nothing is written of it and its broad consequences are a subject of no investigation.
While people around the world were told the plane was “lost” or “crashed,” it was being monitored by NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) and its regional defense partners through secret systems installed in the plane.
In 2006, Boeing announced the following, from a John Croft article in Flight Global:
Boeing last week received a US patent for a system that, once activated, removes all controls from pilots to automatically return a commercial airliner to a predetermined landing location.
The “uninterruptible” autopilot would be activated – either by pilots, by onboard sensors or even remotely via radio or satellite links by government agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency, if terrorists attempt to gain control of a flight deck.
Boeing says: “We are constantly studying ways we can enhance the safety, security and efficiency of the world’s airline fleet.”
Similarly, Raytheon Corporation was awarded a contract by the Federal Aviation Administration 8 years ago to implement an “Advanced Route Evaluation System” (ARES) to work in concert with the system operated by the Central Intelligence Agency.
In addition, the technical staff at Rolls Royce, a fact also reported in the Wall Street Journal, continually monitored the plane’s flight.
Hundreds of people knew exactly where the plane was, how every system was working, what had been “turned off” not only when but where and exactly where the plane is now.  Every word told the press, has been a lie.
Every word told by the mainstream media has been a lie.
Now everyone knows that the plane continued flying for hours.  This is where the cover up becomes problematic; you see everything about the plane was known, position, conditions of the engines, oxygen levels in the cockpit and passenger compartment, this and much more.
Even if the plane couldn’t be remotely piloted, its systems under “uninterruptable” control, a term coined by Boeing itself, the 777/200’s supposed “Flying Dutchman” journey to the South Pole is more than implausible.
The CIA along with Joint military commands set up during the Global War on Terror, tracked Flight 370, monitoring it continually, monitoring the murder of its passengers, monitoring its landing, monitoring its refueling and know exactly where it is.
If the plane really went down “off Antarctica,” they then monitored and “allowed” that.
In Britain, technicians for Rolls Royce monitored the plane as well, reporting its position to the British government every minute it was in the air.  Those technicians have been silent, the British government has never been asked, and no one has been asked.
As the largest “Where’s Waldo” hunt in history goes on, now pulling in data from weather satellites and fleets of anti-submarine warfare planes unleashed upon the Indian Ocean, the entire thing is an “act,” a would-be comical farce.
Flight 370 is a Boeing 777/200, one of the most automated planes in the world.  We will be outlining some of the specifics that make this theft or hijacking or alien abduction or whatever the mainstream media chooses to call it not just improbable but government sponsored terrorism.
This isn’t the first time something like this has happened.  When four airliners “disappeared” on 9/11 much of what we are seeing today occurred then, but with far less technology being denied and suppressed.
According to Dr’s James Fetzer and Dean Hartwell, planes involved in 9/11 were still flying elsewhere after being listed as having crashed or never took off in the first place.  These reports, though backed by verifiable data, were considered wild and suppositional by most but, in light of the Flight 370 debacle, deserve to be reconsidered.
Yes, planes can fly for hours after having crashed and, “yes,” authorities will lie about, not just the location of planes but show a frightening indifference when it comes to the now obviously pre-planned “disappearance” of passengers.
There are a number of devices on commercial aircraft embedded in such a way as to prevent disabling whilein flight.  You will never hear about where they are, what frequencies they broadcast on or how they work.
They are there.  There are highly classified and they were on Flight 370, being continually monitored by military and security forces tasked specifically with preventing commercial aircraft from being used as weapons.
We all remember the testimony at the 9/11 Commission hearings.  Condoleezza Rice, General Myers, Rumsfeld and Cheney, none of them had ever heard of the possibility of planes used as weapons no matter how many memos they had sent or received contradicting their testimony.
Similarly, days, even weeks later, one of the great “disappearing tricks” of all time,  and the American military not only monitored every mile travelled but knew exactly when and where the passengers were killed.  Part of the admitted “redirection” of Flight 370 included 45 minutes at 45,000 feet.
There is a procedure taking exactly that long at that altitude for depressurizing the cabin, using up existing oxygen supplies and killing passengers.
We received this from a Boeing 777 pilot with a major airline.  From an article in New Eastern Outlook (Russia):
“Just a quick update with what I know about the Malaysia 777 disappearance.  The Boeing 777 is the airplane that I fly.  It is a great, safe airplane to fly.  It has, for the most part, triple redundancy in most of its systems, so if one complete system breaks (not just parts of a system), there are usually 2 more to carry the load.  It’s also designed to be easy to employ so 3rd world pilots can successfully fly it.  Sometimes, even that doesn’t work…
There’s many ways to fly the 777 and there are safety layers and redundancies built into the airplane now to Malaysia.  There are so many communication systems on the airplane:  3 VHF radios, 2 SatCom systems,  2 HF radio systems, plus Transponders and active, ‘real time’ monitoring through CPDLC (Controller to Pilot Data Link Clearance) and ADS B(Air Data Service) through the SatCom systems and ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System) thru the VHF, HF and SatCom systems.  The air traffic controllers can tell where we are, speed, altitude, etc. as well as what our computers and flight guidance system has set into our control panels.  Big Brother for sure!  However, most of these things can be turned off.
But, there are a few systems that can’t be turned off and one is the engine monitoring systems.  The Malaysia airplane, like our 777-200’s, uses Rolls Royce Trent Engines (as a piece of trivia….Rolls Royce names their motors after rivers….because they always keep on running!)  Rolls Royce leases these motors to us and they monitor them all the time they are running. In fact, a few years back, one of our 777’s developed a slow oil leak due and partial equipment failure.  It wasn't bad enough to set off the airplane’s alerting system, but RR was looking at it on their computers.  They are in England, they contact our dispatch in (REDACTED), Dispatch sends a message to the crew via SatCom in the North Pacific, telling them that RR wants them to closely monitor oil pressure and temp on the left engine.
The crew did all of that and landed uneventfully, but after landing and during the taxi in, the left engine shut itself down using it’s redundant, computerized operating system that has a logic tree that will not allow it to be shut down if the airplane is in the air…only on the ground.  Pretty good tech.   Anyway, the point was that RR monitors those engines 100% of the time they are operating.  And don’t EVER get in an Airbus!!”
What do we know for sure?  We know the plane was tracked continually.  We know classified systems were on board that could reroute and land the plane no matter what any hijacker could have done.
We know the passengers could be killed easily using control systems that should not be available to crew or hijackers but, for some reason, are a major “hole” in the security of an aircraft that has multiple redundancy systems for other “mishaps.”
We know the media has never addressed simple technical issues that a simple “fact check” on Google could have rectified.  Did they lie on purpose?
Did someone tell them to lie?
Sources claim the plane landed on Diego Garcia, was refueled, dead passengers “disembarked” and was moved elsewhere?
Is this a better explanation than flying to the South Pole hidden from the world through multiple simultaneous failures of safety, communications, counter-hijacking and autopilot systems?
What we are certain of is that in light of today’s announcement, a series of seemingly plausible rationales for what we really know to have been utterly impossible are being concocted.
This effort is what is now called “reporting

Friday, 28 March 2014


Does ANYONE set up a chess board, putting pieces carefully in place - with no intention of commencing a game? Military assets are the 'chess pieces' of the superpowers (USA, Russia, China) - and they love to play this 'game' (and ALWAYS at OUR expense).

A few weeks ago when I was speculating that world war 3 is becoming more likely than UN-likely with each passing month...the usual cadre of 'status quo will prevail ad infinitum' naive cheerleaders were telling me "Commerce runs the world now - do you really think Russia or China would invade anyone when they are so dependent on global commerce now?"...but that is PRECISELY why it WILL happen, the world is so interconnected by commerce now (China OWNS most of the USA's debt in bonds - if China calls in that debt the US Economy - and dollar - collapses)...people think because the USA is still  the one country with the most nuclear weapons - that therefore no-other country will ever 'dare' to challenge this hegemony.
Russia IS already and China WILL next....and the pro's and cons of 'actually doing anything beyond mere words will prevail again...because the FACT is...the world (literally) cannot AFFORD to cease all trade with the USA, Russia OR China....they together run the world economy and need each other - despite all the political posturing  and rhetoric you will see them display publicly.

I am not saying they will never attempt to destroy each other...but I AM saying that IF they DO - they will do so the same way they have done so twice long drawn out bloody years of CONVENTIONAL warfare...the kind of slaughter that affects everyone severely EXCEPT the tiny elite that actually run the world from behind the wars have little to no effect on won't be them or their children who will die in these will be YOURS and MINE.

Did any of you who believe this 'another great war is not going to happen because of global commerce' rationale ever consider the numerous prophecies written by seers from different cultures in different parts of the world in different centuries - that ALL point to the inevitability (they ALREADY have foreseen it in visions) of this coming final global conflict #3?

NONE of them say it will be an all-out worldwide devastating Nuclear exchange that will be over in minutes, they ALL say it will last about 25 years and be CONVENTIONAL, laying bloody waste to 1/3 of the Earth (no continent will escape some carnage this time...just as WW1 only affected the 'continent' of Europe, but WW2 was bigger and affected other continents - WW3 will be biggest of all and will affect ALL continents) - and result in 1/3 of mankind's current population dying due to war, famine and disease CAUSED by this expect almost 2.5 BILLION of us to die by the time it is all over....and the same cartel of criminals who rule our lives today - will STILL emerge to rule the lives of the survivors at the end of this next round of 'Great war' bullshit.

It is BECAUSE we live in a world chained together by financial tethers - that a country such as Russia (or China - or the USA) CAN and WILL act aggressively (if they so desire) in these times we are living in ...because NO-ONE is truly going to do one damned-thing to STOP it, we may/will see opposing sides engage militarily directly or via proxies...but the USA/RUSSIA or CHINA are NOT going to launch a nuclear missile at each other when they know the recipient can retaliate the same way on them...remember the old African saying "When the Elephants fight it is the grass that suffers" is YOU and I...that are the 'little insignificant civilian populations' of the world who are the 'Grass' and the USA, Russia and China are the 'Elephants'...they will fight with a degree of self control (like boxers, limiting themselves to a temporary 'knock-out' of the opponent at best...not a 'kill' like in Gladiator combat) ...or just watch each other trample wherever desired....but they are not going to commit 'suicide' in our defence (though they will TRY to kill the other if victory is absolutely certain)....and in the meantime they WILL watch each other cause OUR deaths without losing any sleep among themselves.  

Damon Gerard Corrie
28 March 2014




We have a confirmed case of involuntary disappearance of one Crimean Tatar. Reshat Ametov about ten days ago went to recruitment office which that time was under Ukrainian Government control (later they were invaded and occupied by non identified special troops or local paramilitaries), he was last seen at the central square of Simferopol, where Militia patrol (Police), which already took the oath to Crimean Government instead of Ukraine took him away. Later nobody had news about him. His portrait with apeal to look for him was regularly published at ATR TV channel (private Crimean Tatar owned). 
Yesterday the unknown corpse buried in the ground with the traces of violent death and tortures was found at Zemlanichnoye village of Belogorsk Region.
The investigation was undertaken by local Militia. Today his wife has recognised his body.
It's the first documented case for Crimean Tatars but there is about 10 people of journalists and pro-Ukrainian activists. You may find the descriprion at
That's all for now.

Saturday, 15 March 2014


I shall be taking my brood to watch the new 'Jesus' movie (Son of God) tonight, together as a family; should I be ashamed to say that publicly?

I disdain 'Bible thumpers' (I am not a follower of the entire 'Bible' for that would make me a 'Biblican')....and I never attend Church - only rarely (like once a year) for the sake of someone else I love (no need to name her) for whom it actually means something, but I never deny the perfection of the teachings of Jesus either...and there is nowhere in the 4 Gospels where he tells anyone to gather in a building once a week or more (if you REALLY have time to waste on show without substance) in order to 'save your souls'...if I recall correctly - Jesus said we will be judged by the Creator according to our DEEDS done in THIS life to help others, not by being a regular attendant anywhere to sit, stand, kneel, donate money and listen to someone read (usually about Paul and other inferior players of the New Testament).

And I am damn sure I know full well the depth and depravity of heinous crimes and injustices done to MY ancestors (and many scandals & abuse that is STILL occurring worldwide) in the name of the 'Church' and in the name of 'Jesus'...but the big difference between ME and many others... lies in the fact that I do not let my mistrust, contempt & disdain for organised Christianity (and all forms of 'Organised religion' in fact) - make me turn against the Messenger or his message...I am mature enough - I think, to know the difference between initial divine truths and subsequent man-distorted lies.

To all of those people out there who have some deep seated hatred for anything that concerns the name 'Jesus' because of what false 'Christians' have done (or 'new' information being peddled - which they never suspect might itself be from the forces arrayed against this humble and divine teacher) - and are still doing...I merely challenge you to read the sayings of Jesus AGAIN, and tell me honestly - what aspect or part of what he had to say - do you find so offensive that in your mind you should REJECT everything concerning him?

You can nit-pick all manner of petty and spiritually insignificant and unimportant 'points' that you want...was he born on this date or that...was he this complexion or that...was he this height or that...was he crucified or not....was he resurrected or not....did he travel to this place or this the cloth that buried him or not.....and NONE of that makes one dam difference in the FACT that what he had to say was profoundly wise and worth implementing in our own lives - and we would ALL be better human beings if we did so.

There is nothing he preached that is against the spiritual wisdom teachings of my own Lokono-Arawak tribe, and nothing he said was against the manner in which we pray for the healing of others with sacred Tobacco in my family, the teachings of Jesus have not diminished or supplanted my ancestral animist spirituality in any way, it has only reinforced it by repeating the same core 'animals and plants can be used by the Creator in his dealings with men', 'love others as you love yourself', 'peace & love', 'generosity, 'self-sacrifice for others' philosophy.

So put THAT in your pipe and smoke it!


Sent to me 5 minutes ago by my indigenous Crimean Tatar brother from

"Our sources among Crimean separatists on anonymity basis inform us that the Kremlin appointed Russian general Nikolay Pankov as responsible for creation and coordination of activities of the “Crimean self-defense” units. Despite all Pankov’s efforts, it is now almost impossible to control all gangs of the “Crimean self-defense”. Instead of ensuring internal safety, these units are actively settling scores with their ideological and personal opponents. At present, there flourish numerous kidnappings, extortions, gangs’ attacks on civil population in Crimea. There are appeals of some field “self-defense” commanders to capture weapons of the Ukrainian military units and to avenge on Crimean tatars. Russian military leadership is deeply concerned with the problem how to calm down bands of Crimean separatists which are under their wardship. The aim of Russia is to observe appearance of “legal procedures” for withdrawal Crimea from Ukraine, not in kindling of civil war, chaos and anarchy. According to our sources, Nikolay Pankov gives instructions to vice-prime of self-declared “Crimean government” Olga Kovitidi. By instructions of Pankov, Kovitidi demands of her subordinates to establish order in Crimea. These subordinates are: the head of Crimean security officials Sergey Gutsulaev, the chief of staff of Crimean “self-defense” Vladimir Mercalov, the chief of the “united staff of Sevastopol defense” Oleg Roslyakov. So far, attempts to pacify militants have no effect. In case of an armed attack of the gangs on the Ukrainian military units, or on Crimean tatars’ settlements it will be impossible to avoid victims."

And are we so naive as to NOT believe that Russia will have a perfectly 'legitimate' and 'humanitarian'-sounding  excuse (cover story) to fully invade & occupy in order to 'protect' it's citizens (that previous USSR regimes implanted in the Crimea & Ukraine at the end of WWII) ....these same citizens by ethnicity who will either be retributively targeted in reprisal attacks that pro-Russian militias conduct on non-Russian peoples in the first place? Quite possibly a few false flag orchestrated random-looking attacks may occur on Russia citizens in Crimea and Ukraine - to give this smokescreen a veneer of 'plausibility'?  

Thursday, 13 March 2014


To me the BIGGER story worth noting here is how frequent in virtually ALL ancient texts - people deemed 'righteous' and full of spiritual wisdom were ALWAYS people with long hair (every Guru, every Mystic hermit etc), even Mohammed did not cut the hair on his face or head (most devout Muslim men STILL maintain full beards & shoulder length hair is the second most common look, clean shaved faces & heads is rare), not only Jesus - but EVERY Hebrew man (and virtually ALL 'un-civilised' peoples in every tribe) had long hair (shoulder length or greater), only the Romans (a spiritually dead & negative-entity-pantheon of Hedonistic 'gods' worshiping people) maintained clean shaven faces and close-cropped heads of hair (like the 'Apostle' Paul who grew up in Roman culture, claimed to have a divine vision, and then began to preach that 'it is a disgrace for a man to have long hair' in Paul's view Jesus and EVERY other non-Roman culture assimilated person is a 'disgrace'...note how frequently 'Paul' is quoted in most 'Christian Churches'...then wonder likely do NOT know of the 'Epistle of James' - because the organised Church deliberately omitted it from the Bible they gave us...but the half-brother of Jesus - James, who was one of the 12 Disciples chosen by Jesus himself said and I quote:    "Letters in the Epistle of James found with the Dead Sea Scrolls written by the disciple James the brother of Jesus called Paul "a spouter of lies" . The epistle of James was written in part for the trial of Paul at the church of Ephesus (Revelation 2:2) where Paul is that false apostle the Lord spoke about and was tried, found a heretic and expelled. Paul mentions this fact in  2 Timothy 1:15 This you know, that all those in Asia have turned away from me,"...only OUR Churches are still turning TO the words of Paul more than ANYONE else at every Church service.

But let us examine the long haired TRUE Buddha we ALSO are not told about (neither are most Buddhist monks who now follow a false doctrine of shaven heads as well..... as a deceiver ALSO infiltrated their 'organizing' of Buddha's teachings into a 'religion' as well...and used it to control millions of minds in the East (as Paul has succeeded to achieve in the West):

One of Buddha's disciples drew his image secretly, while Buddha was teaching.

Yes, Sakyamuni Buddha is of the Mongoloid race.

The original portrait stored in the British museum of the oldest image of the Buddha can be seen at the end of article.

Before the term Nepal came to exist from 4th B.C, it was called "Kiratdesh".

Kiratdesh was never part of Bharat (India) as mentioned in Veda and other Hindu scriptures.

Buddha was born into a Shakya family,whom are Mongoloid in race.That's why he is also known as "Sakyamuni"("sage of the Shakyas")

Come to Kathmandu and go to Newar towns in Patan and Bhakatpur. you would meet Shakya communities...a sub group of the Newar, then look them straight into their eyes and see if they look Indo-Aryan to you.

Now ask me what proof do you have that Shakya was Indo-Aryan? Just because he was from a royal family (Kshatriyas) doesn't mean he was from the Aryan race.

'Kshatriyas' refers to Warriors and Kings. There were Kirat (Mongoloid) kings and warriors too hence the 'Kshatriyas' category.

Over 2500+ years ago, the Himalayas region was a stronghold of Kiratas. 'Kiratas' means 'the Mongoloid race'. This is even mentioned in the Vedas, Puranas, Epic.

The Sutta Lakkhan, describes the Shakya, whom the Gautma Buddha was born into as "those yellow-skinned, soft and delicate as the bronze, his dark hair and black slanted eyes" (dialogues of the Buddha, Part III p.138)

Indo-Aryan writers wants to claim all the good things for themselves. Nowhere was Aryan Civilization at the foothills of the Himalayas during (Buddha and Shiva's time) which is over 2500+ years ago.The Aryan civilization and their settlement was at the upper reaches of the Indus, Yamuna, and Gangetic plains near Rajasthan in northwest India bordering with Pakistan

The foothill of the Himalayas region belongs to Mongoloid civilization whom the Aryan refer to as 'Kirat'. Still in doubt, please refer to this website and ask the vice-President of the Council of the World Buddhist University and Mahachulalongkornrajvidalya University in Bangkok, Thailand. 

Wednesday, 12 March 2014


CONGRATULATIONS to our 15 year old daughter Sabantho - she was the only student in her class to receive a 100% mark in her Religious studies project (not bad for an Animist-Christian Lokono-Arawak girl).

Here is what she had to say:


In the world today, the most technologically rich countries and societies have become the most spiritually impoverished, they have all the inventions of man that exist, but have little to nothing of divine wisdom - such as the teachings of Jesus - left in their possession.

On the contrary, the average person in the most materially developed societies on Earth look down on people who still believe in a supernatural Creator as being 'old-fashioned, backward, superstitious, or believers in 'fairy tales'.

Internally, among ourselves, the Christian community is partly to blame for the negative impression that others in the world have of us today (past atrocities done in 'Jesus' name or in the name of the 'Church' notwithstanding), and beyond the sexual moral scandals; a far more widely perceived negative impression of Christians is caused by the so-called Evangelical Christians.

A REAL Christian is supposed to be a follower of the teachings of Jesus the Christ, and Jesus's teachings are contained only in the four Gospels of the New Testament; but many Evangelists pay more attention to Old Testament 'Fire and Brimstone' teachings of Moses - than the 'Peace and Love' teachings of Jesus.

The Evangelical Christians also preach a totally false 'Prosperity Gospel' that they invented themselves - just like their Churches (which preach what the average hedonistic person WANTS to hear - not what they NEED to hear).
In this 'Prosperity Gospel' the Tele-Evangelist Charlatans openly say things like: "God wants us to have as many material possessions and luxuries as we can acquire in this life"....and this is the complete OPPOSITE of what Jesus preached to his followers, Jesus specifically said that material possessions mean nothing to God.

Jesus also warned us that human beings cannot love earthly riches and ALSO love our heavenly father - because our heart will be focussed on one more than the other. In actual fact, there is not a single place in any of the four Gospels where Jesus had anything good to say about being rich on Earth.

This is why Evangelical leaders become the wolves in sheep's clothing and false prophets that Jesus warned us about - when they lead their followers to give part of their monthly incomes as 'tithes' to their churches (that these televangelists created themselves as their own private for-profit - though tax exempt - businesses).

Sometimes these con-men even tell their followers to bequeath their property to the the 'Church' instead of to their own family members who should rightfully inherit such things. Of course they tell their followers that 'God will bless them' for doing this.

Evangelical Christian leaders become very wealthy off of the gullibility of their followers with their 'Bible Businesses', and this allows these 'preachers' to own mansions, luxury cars, aircraft, yachts, expensive clothes and jewellery, and all from simply lying to their trusting followers every Sunday (sometimes several times a week).

People in other major religions look at these famous Evangelists - who are on TV channels all over the world 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, and they wrongfully judge ALL Christians as being simple-minded, buffoonish, materialistic frauds and hypocrites who make a mockery of Jesus's divine, solemn, and humbly perfect teachings.

Sabantho Aderi Audrey Corrie, age 15
Class Upper 3D, St. Ursulas Secondary School


Tuesday, 11 March 2014


Now my Indigenous Tatar friends in Crimea CANNOT escape by Land or land all the exit routes are roadblocked by Russian and pro-Russian forces, and I see on the news today that at the airport the ONLY planes being allowed to land or take off are coming FROM Russia - and going TO Russia....last chance to flee an uncertain fate is now my brother Ghazali's suggestion of a sea escape (we have been strategizing on how to assist our indigenous colleagues in Crimea who are in the Russian's 'black book' because they are well known outspoken leaders and human rights activists of their people - such as Nadir Bekir) .....if that last option is taken away they will ONLY have the option of hiding and fighting for their lives when all of Putin's 'Chess pieces' are in place - and he makes his next move, seeing and no-one and nothing is daring to challenge him yet (an approach that guarantees that a bully will act AGAIN and even stronger in like manner).



Why has no-one scientifically explained why 85% of Human beings have RH positive blood type and 15% have RH negative? If we are ALL descended from the same common ancestor this would be impossible, also - why is it that when an RH positive woman is impregnated by an RH negative man - the mother's body has an allergic reaction and creates anti-bodies - rejects the fetus and tries to abort it? (Infants Haemolytic disease) As though it is a virus to be repelled? In the study of Genetics we learn that we can 'only inherit what our ancestors had except in the case of mutation'. 

Rh positive humans and all other primates have the same blood factors (which is compatible with a common remote genetic ancestry), but primates and 85% of homo sapiens do NOT have the RH negative blood type and cannot accept transfusions of this type of blood either - our bodies reject it and try to destroy it. Why is this? All animals known to man can breed with others of their species - size and color is irrelevant (a Great Dane can technically breed with a Chihuahua). 

So why DOES Infant's Haemolytic disease occur if all humans are the same species? We learned last year that the mitochondrial DNA of Caucasoid (aka Europeans) and Mongoloid (aka Orientals) is different from Negroid (aka sub-Saharan Africans) - the former 2 have Neanderthal DNA and the latter does not, so in actual fact the old saying about 'if we cut each other our blood is the same' is not 100% accurate, it looks the same color yes, but on the genetic level we are actually different biologically speaking - but this has nothing to do with the blood type anomaly I am referring to, there are RH positive blood types and RH negative blood types of all races - but science cannot explain why our blood is violently incompatible, either the RH negatives have a different ancestor to RH positive people - or else they are a genetic mutation. 

The only place in nature this occurs is when a Horse and a Donkey create a Mule - a Mule is not the same species as a Horse or a Donkey - just a hybrid mutation of the two distinct species...this fact alone points to the prehistoric cross-breeding of two similar but genetically different species of hominids as having led to the RH negative people among us, if not and they are the result of a mutation - why does their mutation continue with such exact characteristics and not mutate any further? And before anyone misinterprets my comment and infers or assumes things that I did NOT specifically state - I am not interested in any superior/inferior race or 'seed of Satan' theory...I am just stating medical and biological facts for all to consider - since science has been preoccupied with finding a 'missing link' but yet has not adequately explained this bizarre phenomenon with any concrete facts up to the current time of writing. FYI - the Basques of Europe have the highest RH negative blood type occurrence within any human population on Earth - and the Basques are considered to be 'the oldest ethnic group in Europe'.

If you think about it, even Genesis infers that there are 2 types of Humans, for example 'Adam' was ''created' (not evolved) and a rib from the male (a rib is one of the few bones that can be safely removed and have no ill-effect on the patient leading a normal life afterwards - and you can obtain the DNA from the bone marrow in said rib which can be used to clone another human being) was used to 'create' the female....anyone involved in cloning sees this as a clear reference to the same process, only an unscientific layman fails to see the connection.

Then (we read), these two 'created' humans left Eden (Edom in the original Sumerian version) and went among 'other people' clearly there were other non-'created' (the evolved ones perhaps? Because we still have to account for the scientific fact that all RH positive humans and all Apes and monkeys CAN share the same blood) humans in the world outside of the garden of Eden where the 'creation' took place.

The Sumerians were actually very explicit that 'the Gods who came down to earth from the heavens created a man and a woman in Edom' (which according to the geographic location given is now under water off the Iraqi coast in the north Persian gulf - in an area that was FLOODED at the end of the last ice age 10,000 years ago - so there WAS indeed a great flood as well, in fact every indigenous culture in the world describes a 'great flood' in their legends - which is natural because melting ice-caps would raise sea levels - and therefore cause flooding - worldwide)....and you will recall the National Geographic article in the 90's that found genetic evidence for a single ancestral 'Adam' and 'Eve' group of about 2 dozen people (but they did not say if this was for RH negatives or RH positive people - perhaps the RH negatives are the genetic descendants of the 'others' that the 'created' ones eventually lived among (and would have eventually interbred with - hence RH negatives in every race alive today - albeit in smaller (15%) numbers than the RH positives (85%) - the 'chosen people' of the Gods who 'created' them perhaps?).

Genesis is replete with references to the 'Gods' attempted extermination of the 'others' from the face of the Earth in favor of the 'created' ones. Hindu Vedic texts speak of wars between two types of humans as well. This is why one cannot dismiss any ancient text (aka Holy book) in it's entirety, sure they all have nonsense in them - but this is easily distinguishable by the parts where 'god' allegedly tells human beings to do ignorant things that defy common sense (like stone people to death for non-violent crimes).

The other parts that are proving to be quite accurate historical records (albeit with some copyright theft & exaggeration - like 'Noah' which is merely a Jewish version of the Babylonian legend of Gilgamesh (which they first heard when in captivity in Iraq and is 1,000 years OLDER than their re-telling of it with one of their own people as the new hero) - warrant closer scrutiny (science has discovered that there WAS a worldwide flood 10,000 years ago, the 'two of every kind of animal' part is not logical (so he had Kangaroos from Australia in the Ark too and Bison from North America? Lets be serious now!) - if you know how many species of animal there are on the Earth and the stated dimensions of the Ark - you would not believe this fairy-tale aspect of an otherwise factual event.

However, it is logical and quite possible that two of every kind of animal IN THE REGION of the inhabitants of the Ark (not a big geographic area at all and not that many animal species in the middle east either - could theoretically have been easily housed in the stated Ark dimensions)...this is what I tell my Atheist friends who have decided to reject everything...not realizing that science fact and ancient records are increasingly going hand in hand, one just has to be open minded and compare current scientific knowledge to ancient records.

For example - the walls of Jericho did fall all at once, archaeology proved it, but common sense would explain it easily due to an Earthquake - because the amount of men blowing on trumpets that it would take to collapse the 8 foot thick walls found in the ruins of Jericho would take more people than the entire population of the 12 tribes of Israel combined....but heck, no doubt they WERE there surrounding the city with their trumpets, and when an earthquake struck at the opportune time - what would YOU have believed if you were one of the Jews and had heard the lecture beforehand by your high priest & your leader that "God shall be with us this day"? You would naturally believe that it was your faith and trumpeting that did the trick and rejoice too!

The faithful can STILL believe that it was God who caused the earthquake at that precise time and so both believer and non-believer can accept this simple truth of a scientifically proven place & event - and view it from two different perspectives. Likewise, the ruins of both Sodom & Gomorrah have actually been found, and also evidence of a nearby Volcano as having erupted which destroyed them, this is scientific fact, and the faithful can STILL believe that God caused it to erupt to punish these cities...see what I mean? There is room for us ALL to accept the truth of these occurrences and merely interpret them any way we desire, whether via the lens of science or faith - but the fact still remains that these places DID exist (as the Bible described) and were destroyed as LITERALLY (maybe not as 'supernaturally') described...anyone who has seen a Volcanic eruption WOULD see 'fire & brimstone falling from the sky'.

ALL these ancient texts (Vedic, Sumerian, Judaic etc.) become quite revealing and far more credible when you read them with scientific knowledge in hand...leave 'blind faith' for 'blind' people; as for me - I have eyes to see and ears to hear - and so I shall remain.

Monday, 10 March 2014


The Crisis in Crimea is a perfect example of why the 'we are all humans and are free to live anywhere on the Earth that we want to' is DANGEROUS.....the indigenous peoples of Crimea USED to be the majority in Crimea, naturally - as they were the first people to live there, then Stalin came along and invaded with the army of the USSR during World War II, Stalin saw that it was a nice geographical area - and basically told a few million Russians - to "go and inhabit the Crimea (and he helped them to do so) - you have every right to live there - because we are all citizens of the USSR".....when the Russians were not displacing the TRUE indigenous Crimeans fast enough - he rounded up the indigenous Crimeans and deported them by the millions to other less desirable parts of the vast USSR.

However, Stalin could have waited and just kept settling the non-natives on native land (like in the USA) - the end result would have been the same, the people happily living in a land FIRST - get pushed out of the way (often killed) by people who came AFTER them and found them there.....sometimes you do not even have to shed a drop of blood, but if there are 1 million indigenous inhabiting their land - and 2 million non-indigenous come to live there telling themselves they 'have as much right to live in YOUR territory as you do' - their mere presence in overwhelming numbers reduces YOU to a 'minority' in your own homeland - and will destroy your indigenous culture and way of life - often completely (if they remain long enough and multiply fast enough).

This is why humans need to truly RESPECT other peoples (differences and PRE-EXISTING RIGHTS to the lands they inhabit), and as International Human Rights Laws clearly state - the people who inhabit a geographical area FIRST - if found there by peoples who arrived AFTER them...have MORE rights to that geographical area than ANY OTHER PEOPLES WHO ARRIVED SUBSEQUENTLY.

So as weird as it may sound to you, an Ethnic Indo-Aryan Hindu - Mr. X (for example) - born in Barbados (if he knows which tribal nation back in India he descends from) STILL has more 'rights' to his ancestors tribal lands in India than ANY non-indigenous person seeking to live on the tribal lands of Mr. X's people back in India - even if the non-Indigenous person was actually born in India (say a child of European ex-pats born in the New Delhi Hospital for example) even though Mr. X was born on the other side of the world in the Caribbean island of Barbados.

So basically, if you are not a Kalinago - you will NEVER have 'as much rights' to live in the island of Dominica as a Kalinago person do have a right to live there due to the circumstances beyond your control that caused you to be born there....but your rights are NOT equal to those of the indigenous people who were the landlords before your ancestors inherited the theft of the Kalinago lands from the Colonial invaders responsible for bringing your ancestors to Dominica.

A lot of West Indians have no problem understanding this FACT of International Law when I put it in the scenario of the Black Africans and the White Afrikaaner settlers...on the contrary - they see right away that 'no white man could ever have EQUAL rights/claim to land in sub-Saharan Africa as a black African....but when I point out the fact that the same scenario exists (just different ethnic players) in the entire Western Hemisphere - suddenly they cannot see it...and get highly offended and seek a million-and-one excuses as to why 'it is different in the Americas'.

To be fair to Europeans - in their own continent no non-Caucasoid person has any EQUAL claim to the tribal territories of Europe either (the few that remain as recognised indigenous peoples - Basques, Samii etc.). This - as I said - is an INTERNATIONAL Human Rights Law, it exists for every ethnic group of mankind - not just for some and not others.

Humans are officially (Biologically) classified as an Ape, a species of bi-pedal hominid animal, so it might be useful to examine other animal species...a 'German Shepherd' dog born in Trinidad does not become a 'Trinidadian Shepherd'...everyone knows where that 'breed' (though they are ALL dogs) originated from...and we humans are just different 'breeds' of Homo Sapiens (though we are all humans) basically, and likewise we know where certain 'breeds' of human (in macro-speak = Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid etc., in micro-speak = Celts, Slavs, Bantu, San, Han, Hmong etc.) originate from.. AS that particular 'breed' we now Indian Elephant born in a London Zoo does not suddenly become (it will never become infact) an 'English Elephant' has merely become an 'Indian Elephant that was born in England'...if it gets loose in the countryside of England - just like any other 'non-native species' - it will NOT be accorded the same 'legal right to exist in England' as any 'native species' will be treated as a 'foreign and invasive species not part of the natural environment' may get as highly offended as you want, but I am just telling you how International Law basically rules on these matters in a stark of a manner as I can using similar (but controversially different) examples (such as 'lesser' animals).

A famous Reggae singer once wrote a song the chorus of which said "No matter where you come from - as long as you are a black man - you're an African" (also - if you are a white person - no matter where you are in the world you are a European, you might not see yourself that way, and very few still think with a 'European' mindset...but the fact remains ALL 'white' people left from Europe and spread out in the world, they did not originate in Australia, New zealand, South Africa or Canada or the USA (and I can't figure out why people have a problem accepting this inescapable truth)....the reggae singer was more accurate (generally speaking) echoing these sentiments according to current legal codes concerning human ethnic groupings than most want to believe, this is why all these centuries later people are still classified as 'Afro-Guyanese' and 'African-American' (also Irish-American, Italian-American etc.). The ONLY people with the word 'Native' in front of their name/designation in THIS Hemisphere are the 'Native Americans' (aka 'Amerindians' - which is just the abbreviation of two words = 'American Indians')....and if you are from any other ethnic group you will never be classified as 'Native' in THIS Hemisphere...and neither will you ever have the SAME legal rights to any lands in this hemisphere (under International Human Rights Laws) as a 'Native American does'.

Yes - we are spiritual beings INSIDE of these biological realities we are born/incarnated into, but as long as we exist in this dimension/physical plane of existence, our differences ARE a fact of our daily lives, whether we like/dislike/acknowledge/reject this or not, and this is why we cannot go around disrespecting other peoples differences and usurping their rights as uninvited (and ungrateful) guests in the geographical homes of others. If we understand and remain cognizant of this - these kinds of ethnic-cleansing human tragedies that we see unfolding in Crimea (and elsewhere) would stop happening.

Personally, I would LOVE to see EVERYONE embrace and celebrate their ancestral cultural origins, why do some Negroid peoples laugh at other Negroids who are proud of their African heritage - and refer to them if they see them dressed in African attire as 'silly looking' or 'foolish'? (meanwhile these same former category of persons are dressed/live/eat/think like PERFECT imitation Europeans themselves...which they don't find 'silly' or 'foolish' at all strangely).

Why do some New World Mongoloid peoples try to distance themselves from Old World Mongoloids as if they 'have nothing to do with us'? When in fact we have MORE to do with them biologically (and even culturally in many cases...go research Mongolian Shamanism or Siberian indigenous dwellings and customs) than ANYONE else!

Why do some Caucasoid peoples distance themselves from their European roots? It does not take long for them to find an ancestor that was born in Europe on their family tree - and in fact the MAJORITY of their ancestors WILL be European born....why fight the inescapable truth?
Look beyond Europe's dark period when it became a deadly virus-like infection in the world - to a time when Europe still had hundreds of flourishing indigenous tribal nations of it's own, defining and defending their own places in what was then their contemporary world - before the rise of Empires led them to their doom (and to cause the doom of hapless others worldwide). Your European Tribal Ancestors once lived in harmony with nature reason to turn your back on your own European heritage.
We can ALL be proud of our different and beautiful human ethnic diversities AND still live together in harmony - not by denying our differences, but by respecting them. 





'Democracy' is quite often only a 'success' in Theory, let me give but a few examples to support my argument (not that i'm asking for any counter-arguments mind you), Cuba is a 'dictatorship' and Barbados (my island) is a 'democracy' (the the USA and Canada)....Cubans cannot vote to change their ruling political party by the ballot box - whereas I can (every 5 years) Cuba, an official from the central government comes around to every neighborhood in the entire country every week and asks the residents if they have any complaints about local government officials that they want to register, the local government official is not privy to the names of the persons who complain about them - only Central Government is, and Central government then investigates every complaint about every government official and if the complaints are true - that local government official is fired for corruption/incompetence and is replaced (with an immediate end to any perks their job may have provided them while held). In Barbados - if we had this low level 'direct democracy' in place that Cuba has - the constituents of our Minister of Finance could have - for example - complained about his 'obvious incompetence' (if that is the case) and gotten him fired & replaced long ago...instead, we have to wait 5 years for the 'buddy system' of cronyism (both parties use) to expire before we can replace anyone (and they still draw a Ministerial pension for the rest of their lives at our taxpayers expense).

Next example, in Croatia the democratic majority voted that homosexual couples do NOT have the right to marry - only heterosexual couples do....this is democracy at work whether you like it or not, the majority HAS spoken...too bad for homosexuals who are always in the minority in EVERY society (except maybe in Ancient Greece)....will we see crowds with rainbow flags rejoicing in the street that 'democracy has prevailed' (for technically it HAS) as we saw in California before? Somehow I doubt that....

Next example - we wanted Egypt to 'enjoy our democratic freedoms' and they DID! But the Islamic brotherhood was voted into office by a democratic majority vote - and suddenly we despised the same 'democratic outcome' that we were previously championing....why the hypocrisy? Either 'Democracy is the GREATEST political system and we wholeheartedly support it (not only when the result is what WE want)...or we do NOT - and are still looking for a better way (my personal view is the latter).
Next example, do you honestly think that if a democratic majority vote was held in South Africa or Zimbabwe to 'take away property owned by whites and re-distribute them among blacks' - that the non-white majority would vote 'NO'? Most people worldwide who have LESS support the idea of taking away from those who have MORE if they (the ones with less) will be the beneficiaries.

That would be an example of a democratic majority deciding on a course of action that effects a minority...but it would STILL be 'democracy' technically speaking.

Next example, if a democratic vote was held in certain anti-foreigner Eastern European countries today for 'All non-native ethnic groups to be evicted from the motherland'...I guarantee you that a technical majority will vote YES...another case of 'a democratic majority' - but would you celebrate the outcome? I wouldn't.

Next example, if a democratic vote was held in America - where native Americans are only 1% of the current population, for a vote on 'Should the US Government and private non-indigenous Americans return all lands stolen from American Indians to tribes still currently in existence'...I guarantee you that most Americans - a very large democratic majority will vote NO! But on a global scale, what use is any democracy where indigenous peoples will ALWAYS be outnumbered and outvoted by a non-indigenous current majority in the lands of the indigenous peoples....what bloody use is this 'fictitious liberty' EVER going to be in us remaining as a minority group in YOUR 'melting pot' societies (imposed on our lands and on our backs without our consent) - if the will of the other non-indigenous ethnic ingredients in this pot will always be visibly prominent and relegate us to the pot bottom where we continue to get burned forever?

If different ethnic groups have never/will never achieve equity being mere minority groups in the political nation states of OTHER ethnic groups, is Separatism so bad after all? Only in our own political nation states ruled by our own peoples in a manner of our own choosing (but treating and being treated by other states as EQUALS) - will we ever achieve the political parity we deserve - and which our ancestors enjoyed for thousands of years. This whole 'minority group' living in a society predominantly comprised of others - is a very dangerous game, dangerous because the majority of mankind is not enlightened enough NOT to revert to ethnic mob rule when anarchy prevails as the East Indians learned in Uganda and now in Burma, and the Bosnian Muslims learned in Serbia, and the Serb Christians learned in Bosnia, and the Coptic Christians are learning in Egypt, and the Kurds learned in Turkic, Arab, and Persian countries, the whites learned in Zimbabwe, the Aborigines learned in Australia, the Maori learned in New Zealand, the Naga and Meitei learned in India, the Jumma People learned in Bangladesh, the Africans and American Indians learned in most of the western Hemisphere, etc. etc. Why can't the Kalinago Nation State (just for example) exist in Dominica as the closest friend and sovereign political ally of the government of Dominica and share the island with them? (non-Kalinago Dominicans need not go anywhere - the land is big enough for all of us, same can be said for ALL the peoples I mentioned). Why is it 'right' that Kalinagos (and ALL the other peoples I mentioned) be ruled by the descendants of Europe or Africa or India (or anyone else that came to their lands from elsewhere and found them there) in their own country forever? Or every other native people who are expected to live 'happily' taking orders from other non-peoples - in their OWN lands - forever?

What is wrong with the UN expanding (is the UN not a 'family' of mankind? Do not successful families continue to grow?) to accommodate a few hundred more independent indigenous states (several are there already such as Tuvalu etc.) in the General Assembly? You have no justifiable reason to deny US the same rights YOU are currently fact - International Human Rights Laws ALREADY says that we have JUST AS MUCH RIGHTS to sovereignty as YOU do....more in fact - since most of you are exercising sovereignty on lands that belong to US not to YOU.

In summation, we should put more faith and support in International Laws than in 'majority vote democracy' (as it is quite flawed in practice), for International laws give a greater guarantee that the voices & rights of ALL human beings are recognised and protected....'CONSENSUS' is best, but easier to achieve in mono-ethnic societies (hence it was easy to achieve in Tribal Nations) than in multi-ethnic ones...for each group of people usually has a very different worldview than another....and one minority group or the other is ALWAYS going to be disenfranchised in a society that is not entirely comprised of enlightened human beings - the only group that fits this description of an enlightened homogenous society that I know of are the Amerindian Kogi People of the Colombian Andes...and they eschew contact with the outside world because of all the disharmony that exists in other societies - unlike their cohesive and very spiritually attuned one (they spend more or their time praying for the Earth and the rest of humanity - they call us their 'little brothers' because we still think and act like children - than we do praying for ourselves). A student of history will know that the world was always a patchwork of very unique separate cultural groups and was the Imperialists who invented the 'melting pot' agenda, forcing a diverse array of people to surrender their core differences and live together...but under the rule of an elitist class of political parasites who reserved the top of their patriarchal & pyramidical society ALL for themselves why continue to force this flawed system where it obviously is not working for the best of everyone? Let us TRULY live as EQUALS and BROTHERS...but not under the barrel of a gun in any 'forced unity' that is one-sided in its distribution of tangible benefits.

Damon Gerard Corrie
Founder & President of the Pan-Tribal Confederacy of Indigenous Tribal Nations, Co-Founder and President of the registered non-profit Caribbean Amerindian Development Organisation (CADO) - which was itself created as a direct result of 2012 Project Access Training - the motto of which is "Dedicated to the Preservation and Promotion of Amerindian Cultural Heritage, and the Hemispheric National Implementation of Internationally recognised Rights of Indigenous Peoples"
He is also the CARICOM Commissioner on the Indigenous Commission for Communication Technologies in the Americas (ICCTA), a member of the Working Group on the American Draft Declaration with the Organisation of American States (OAS) since 2000; and a registered participant of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII) since 2008, and Chief of the Barbados chapter of the United Confederation of Taino People (UCTP).